|
|
|
Interesting Project he has worked on:
In April 2005, the Herbert River Improvement Trust, of which I am chairperson, was recipient of two sets of prefabricated vertical lift floodgates. These were provided under the Sugar Industry Infrastructure Package, two thirds of the purchase cost funded by Governments and the remainder by the Trust. These automatic gates would replace existing flap type gates installed near the mouths of two creeks, which prevented inundation of farmland by floodwaters coming from the Herbert River, into which they flow. Whilst the Trust had participated in discussions relating to the design and specification of the new gates, funding was only confirmed about six weeks before the cut-off date for the project so the decision to accept or reject what was offered had to be made without the opportunity to further explore design considerations.
As a person with some knowledge of PLCs and electronic control systems, I teamed up with the Trust engineer and electrical contractor responsible for the electrical work associated with the installation of the new gates. Our aim was to determine what problems might exist and seek solutions to any problems found. As chairperson of the Trust, my work was unpaid. The Trust engineer undertook the design work associated with interfacing the new gates to the existing conduits, manufacture of work platforms and foundations required for the control cubicles for each site. He also controlled removal of old gates and fitting of new gate assemblies. The commissioning was to be in two stages, first install gates and control cubicles and achieve satisfactory manual operation, then implement full automatic control of the gates.
Some of the issues identified and addressed included:
Changing a single-phase to a three-phase hydraulic pump motor to be used at one site resulting in a saving of more than $30,000 through avoiding the need to replace some spans of aerial supply mains and a distribution transformer.
To test the PLC program, I constructed a dual 4-20mA simulator to synthesize water level data input under flood conditions. Tests revealed modifications were needed to provide a more sophisticated response to flood conditions. The target being gates closed when the water level downstream of gates higher than upstream level, preventing water running up the creeks, and gates open when upstream water level higher than downstream level, allowing water to run out of creeks. Typical flood conditions might require the gates to close and open several times within a couple of hours.
The original programmer was contracted to rewrite the program and software required to implement program changes to the PLC identified and purchased. A suitable laptop PC that would interface with the PLC was also identified and purchased. When the revised program was available it was downloaded to the PLC.
After physical installation of the gates and attempting manual operation it was determined that incorrect hydraulic control valves had been fitted to both sets of gates, preventing the gates being opened. These were replaced with the correct valves.
Further problems existed in that 240Volt mains supply was connected to the proximity switches, mounted on the gate structures. This was undesirable from a safety point of view and circuit modifications were done to permit a 24Volt DC supply to proximity switches.
Circuit alterations were designed and implemented to prevent drop-back when the gates were opened manually.
Proximity switches, determining fully open and fully closed position of each gate, exhibited intermittent loss of sensitivity after a month or two of operation. This fault took significant time to identify and confirm.
It was found that ultrasonic level detectors supplied were unsuitable. Suitable replacements were identified and purchased.
Repeated failure of one type of hydraulic solenoid coil was identified as being due to moisture entry into the coil encapsulation. This was ascertained by careful dissection of three failed coils, with all displaying similar evidence of electrical breakdown.
Hand pumps provided at each site to enable gates to be opened or closed in the event of prolonged mains failure did not work because mains power was required to operate valves connecting the pump into the hydraulic circuit.
|
|
|
|
What it means to Bill to be an Engineering Technologist:
Being an engineering technologist clearly defines for me, my role in the engineering team, a person competent to undertake complex engineering tasks, including researching of and finding solutions to problems within my field of electrical and electronic engineering. Because of my practical knowledge, it often falls within my competence to also implement the solutions I have found.
Being an engineering technologist also identifies me as being a member of the team and this is of particular value to me personally as I have always viewed engineering undertakings as being most effectively carried out by a team approach.
Having started my working life as an apprentice, then transferred to undertake five years training as a technician, followed by further study and examinations for Senior Technician classification in both telephony and radio/broadcasting disciplines, the opportunity to complete an Associate Diploma and then a Bachelor of Engineering Technology, by distance education, was one of the most rewarding experiences of a lifetime devoted to electrical and electronic work.





